Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Denis Kudla vs Daniel Elahi Galan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kudla vs Galan analysis and find out who is favored!
Denis Kudla vs Daniel Elahi Galan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kudla has won 50.6% of points on his second serve, while Galan has won 46.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kudla, in recent form, has won 54.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Galan has won 51.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.88% and 30.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kudla has saved 61.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Galan has saved 58.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kudla has won 55.74% of matches played (W/L 34/ 27), with Galan winning 49.23% (W/L 32/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kudla has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 102/ 62), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 74/ 79). Galan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 250/ 178), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 3/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Kudla has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/ 18), where as Galan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kudla winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kudla winning 4 and Galan winning 1. The last match between Kudla and Galan was at the Phoenix Challenger, 14-03-2024, Second, Hard with Denis Kudla getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kudla and Galan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kudla winning 1 times and Galan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kudla winning 0, and Galan 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kudla has played against opponents with an average rank of 271.11 while Galan has played against players with an average rank of 204.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kudla has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Galan has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kudla has converted 39.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Galan has converted 37.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kudla 2 - 0 Galan
161
Rank
53
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
90
Rank
56
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
56% (495-388)
Career Total W/L
55% (365-298)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
43% (10-13)
$2,357,445
Career Prize Money
$1,431,455
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Denis Kudla | Daniel Elahi Galan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 30 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:42 | 1:41:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (93/149) | 62% (95/154) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (69/93) | 61% (58/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (33/56) | 49% (29/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (8/19) | 10% (1/10) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (67/154) | 32% (47/149) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Denis Kudla
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-7(6) 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
8
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
27 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Denis Kudla | Daniel Elahi Galan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 43% (10/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (33/25) | 43% (25/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (282/262) | 47% (266/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.51 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 123 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:58 | 2:8:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.2 | 161.09 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1013/1760) | 60% (1180/1972) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (702/1013) | 66% (776/1180) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (378/747) | 46% (368/792) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (80/205) | 37% (63/170) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (724/1779) | 39% (724/1875) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 50% (6/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (9/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 43% (9/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 27% (15/4) |
Denis Kudla Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Denis Kudla
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tristan Mccormick
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Denis Kudla
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Denis Kudla
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Denis Kudla
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Bernard Tomic
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
48
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Vasek Pospisil
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Elahi Galan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Christopher Eubanks
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Radu Albot
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Benoit Paire
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(13) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kudla Vs Galan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
